Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
go ahead... be a heretic
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Using IPC::Open3 instead of backtick operator

by ikegami (Patriarch)
on Jun 10, 2016 at 15:57 UTC ( [id://1165307]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Using IPC::Open3 instead of backtick operator
in thread Using IPC::Open3 instead of backtick operator

This is the equivalent of doing no warnings;. It simply silences the message without addressing the issue (preventing error log from being filled with child's STDERR output). If your goal is simply to circumvent perlcritic, it provides far better ways of doing that.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Using IPC::Open3 instead of backtick operator
by RonW (Parson) on Jun 10, 2016 at 17:39 UTC

    True. Is basically a somewhat safer way to accomplish what qx or backticks do.

    My answer was more for completeness.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1165307]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (6)
As of 2024-03-28 14:52 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found