Re: Fast Way to find one array in second array

Are the inner elements single characters as shown; or is that a placeholder for longer strings or numbers or ...?

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I knew I was on the right track :)

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Comment on Re: Fast Way to find one array in second array

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Fast Way to find one array in second array by melmoth (Acolyte) on Aug 14, 2016 at 16:51 UTC
not sure what your asking, or if it's for me, but in the problem I raised each vertex is a string of alphanumeric characters	[reply]
Re^3: Fast Way to find one array in second array by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Aug 14, 2016 at 21:51 UTC
or if it's for me I replied to your post; it is for you. not sure what your asking, Your data showed single characters: `@array1 = [A,B,F,G]`; if that was representative of your real data, there is an optimisation that could be used. each vertex is a string of alphanumeric characters The solution I posted will work for strings (or any other kind of data) and is the fastest solution possible. Over 50 times faster than 1169738; and correct. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I knew I was on the right track :) In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^4: Fast Way to find one array in second array by melmoth (Acolyte) on Aug 14, 2016 at 23:04 UTC
Yes I saw that thanks I'm going to try it along with some other ideas and post back here how it went. thanks.	[reply]