Re^9: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they?


laziness, impatience, and hubris
	PerlMonks

Re^9: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they?

by hippo (Bishop)

on Sep 20, 2016 at 09:50 UTC ( #1172216=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Re^8: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they?
in thread BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they?

Too bad no one is interested in fixing this.

Good news, everyone! Looks like we have a volunteer.

Comment on Re^9: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^10: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? by perl-diddler (Chaplain) on Sep 20, 2016 at 19:52 UTC
Where do I get access and how do I update the existing code? I'm more than happy to look at the problem and see if I'm able to do anything about it.	[reply]
Re^11: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? by hippo (Bishop) on Sep 20, 2016 at 22:52 UTC
See the section "So You'd Like To Join An Order" in What are PerlMonks Orders? with particular reference to pmdev.	[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion

Log In^?

Domain Nodelet^?

www.com | www.net | www.org

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://1172216]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (3)

As of 2022-05-19 18:26 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?

Do you prefer to work remotely?

Results (72 votes). Check out past polls.

Notices^?