Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
XP is just a number
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms?

by BrowserUk (Patriarch)
on Jan 14, 2017 at 23:24 UTC ( #1179580=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms?
in thread [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms?

I did!

(If you have a point to make; try making it.)

  • Comment on Re^2: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms?
by jdporter (Chancellor) on Jan 16, 2017 at 15:05 UTC

    How about read the document I linked and think carefully about how your post's title falls short.

      Wasnt tye who said if you complain the title is inadequate you should specify a suggestion for a better one

      basically be constructive

      and you already have power to consider node -- whatever the purpose of your admonishment, if youre going to follow up with %well rtfm link% you shouldn't have bothered with such weak sauce; go complain about spelling

        Yes, in the context of "node consideration", I did. No, it wasn't much about "basically, be constructive" (though, being constructive is certainly also useful in that context). It was particular to a process like node consideration where a request for privileged action is asked for and voted on but can't really be commented on. For such, the request needs to be very specific (and the person making the request needs to be highly convinced that the action is the best action).

        In other situations, it can be potentially beneficial to not offer an answer but to instead offer a suggested direction for finding an answer. But such can easily fail.

        - tye        

        Fair point. But the OP in this case is the "subject matter expert" regarding the content of the post. No one could compose a better node than he. He just didn't expend the effort in this case. It's not that he couldn't make a much better title; he just seemed to have forgotten the importance of doing so.

        I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.
    A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1179580]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others imbibing at the Monastery: (4)
As of 2022-08-15 04:42 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found

    Notices?