I liked you better as the anonymous monk that link dumped at the bottom of every thread useful information opposed to this nonsense at the top | [reply] |
I liked you better as the anonymous monk that link dumped at the bottom of every thread useful information opposed to this nonsense at the top Sure, I can pretend to be that guy , but then wouldn't you just complain about that? Why do you consider what I said to be nonsense? Is startup instantaneous for anything? Is startup on first request not how fastcgi is supposed to work?
Did you check?
| [reply] |
Sure, I can pretend to be that guy , but then wouldn't you just complain about that? No, because I liked those links and they probably redirected my attention, preventing me from posting in the same way you did, without enough reflection.
Why do you consider what I said to be nonsense?
It is nonsense in the same way that if I asked you why are those 12 male ducks attacking that hen, and you said 'it is functioning as designed?' You could just as a-holey say, "It is not broke?" It is nonsense because it does not make sense that any programmer would design their program to go slow. Was FCGI invented to make the first page slow? Is that a rational goal? It seems just as easy to say, "FastCGI starts up on the first page load"
In a way here, the OP is the designer and so it is not functioning as designed and your answer is wrong. If the design is to start up equally fast across every page load, then fcgi won't work and this is what the op should get out of your response (and did get, from every response except yours)
Is startup instantaneous for anything?
Lightning maybe? Wind? Does anything not function as designed? The OPS design was to know why his program started up slowly and the function of his post was to find out why.
Is startup on first request not how fastcgi is supposed to work?
It is
Did you check
No
| [reply] |
