Re^5: UP-TO-DATE Comparison of CGI Alternatives

I most strenuously disagree. They are a pleasure to maintain unless you write them like they were Mason or CGI.

Comment on Re^5: UP-TO-DATE Comparison of CGI Alternatives

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: UP-TO-DATE Comparison of CGI Alternatives by Anonymous Monk on Mar 24, 2017 at 21:14 UTC
That says more about you than the product. Catalyst is horribly flawed, hence why Dancer and Mojo are taking its market share. Just because YOU ... yeah ...	[reply]
Re^7: UP-TO-DATE Comparison of CGI Alternatives by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Mar 25, 2017 at 02:43 UTC
Who is revealing what now? AKA: Whence does this zero sum tribalism emanate? I am ecstatic that Perl has several strong, fun, powerful, widely-adopted frameworks. I am on record saying Mojo is great and Dancer, while not my cup of tea, is fine and welcome. All Perl success is good for all Perl developers. Job listings still favor Catalyst, 12 years after the author of Mojo originally released it, regardless of any fact-free assertions about flaws, so pedal your venom under an identity, nobody, or be dismissed as same.	[reply]


laziness, impatience, and hubris
	PerlMonks