Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
more useful options
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: is Plack really necessary?

by dsheroh (Monsignor)
on Apr 26, 2018 at 09:04 UTC ( #1213590=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: is Plack really necessary?
in thread is Plack really necessary?

In your diagram of the simplistic deployment stack, I notice a distinct lack of layers labeled "Plack". Or is your overall point that "Plack" really just means "any arbitrary implementation of PSGI"?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: is Plack really necessary?
by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Apr 26, 2018 at 16:19 UTC

    Yes. We only happen to have one and it lives in Plack:: but it's just a PSGI implementation/harness; just like CGI.pm is a CGI spec implementation. I'm glad miyagawa chose to keep the names separate though I suppose both approaches have some points of confusion.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1213590]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others exploiting the Monastery: (3)
As of 2022-05-21 07:04 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Do you prefer to work remotely?



    Results (76 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?