http://qs1969.pair.com?node_id=1217088


in reply to Re: Replacing CGI.pm is busywork
in thread Replacing CGI.pm

I agree to the extent that a CGI script that is ready to move to Apache::Registry is also ready to move to psgi via Plack::App::WrapCGI. I disagree that mod_perl should be recommended today. It RFC:SHOULD NOT be. We've been over the reasons this is the case, and has been for a decade, many times now.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Replacing CGI.pm is busywork
by Anonymous Monk on Jun 21, 2018 at 03:14 UTC

    I agree to the extent that a CGI script that is ready to move to Apache::Registry is also ready to move to psgi via Plack::App::WrapCGI.

    As we should

    I disagree that mod_perl should be recommended today.

    I dont see that a particular persistent environment has been recommended. If you know of a better guide on fixing up cgi scripts you know what to do.

    We've been over the reasons this is the case, and has been for a decade, many times now.

    Not us we :)

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom