![]() |
|
P is for Practical | |
PerlMonks |
Re^2: Any downsides to this slurp idiom?by haukex (Archbishop) |
on Jun 22, 2018 at 17:39 UTC ( #1217233=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Why not use File::Slurp? One reason is what hippo said, the other being that this is IMO one of those cases where pure Perl does everything I need - I can read lines in list context and I can use layers like :raw, :crlf, and :encoding(...) - there's really no need to load a module. (Unless I'm doing additional stuff, like filename manipulation, in which case I usually use Path::Class, which has slurping and spewing built in.)
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|