We don't bite newbies here... much | |
PerlMonks |
Re^5: Listing Best Replies First: destroys threads and annoys readers (linear boards)by LanX (Saint) |
on May 06, 2019 at 15:53 UTC ( [id://1233404]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
The real "problem" is far more fundamental and wouldn't be changed by chronological order. It's the old ideological war between linear° and threaded discussion boards. And as usual people want the cake and eat it too. (Threaded discussions with linear order? WTF ) Please note that SO is limiting to 3 "levels" depth. (Question/Answer/Comment- And I am always confused by that structure) IMHO the only possible answer is a "flexible" adjustment to the needs of the current reader. I.e. DHTML to optionally show the sub-tree overview like in RAT, reordering the replies, folding and navigating them. There is for sure no right order for threads, if one reply provokes a large subtree, then the next direct reply is buried behind, even if it's the "second best" reply. Folding is the only alternative which comes to mind. BTW: I'm still waiting for an example where another answer was implicitly referenced without linking or naming the author. I remember rare instances of people talking about "the former reply". But most replies here are from regulars, which don't do this. So it's not happening "often"
Cheers Rolf
°) compare phpbb if you don't know what linear boards are, or look at WP https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conversation_threading
In Section
Perl Monks Discussion
|
|