Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: How do you feel about mod_perl?

by kwoff (Friar)
on Nov 06, 2001 at 00:21 UTC ( [id://123407]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: How do you feel about mod_perl?
in thread How do you feel about mod_perl?

I can't see why anyone would use that. You get the complexity of mod_perl with the bad performance of CGI? Maybe you could run your Apache::Emulator script in Apache::Registry or Apache::PerlRun just to complete the circle from mod_perl syntax to CGI-ness back to mod_perl? :)

In the Description section from the link you gave, he points out that some things, like subrequests, are impossible. So that comes back to your question of what parts of application programming are available in mod_perl that aren't in CGI. You can emulate the CGI-compatible parts in mod_perl. The only reason not to just use CGI then would be so that it could run fast if you got to run your stuff under mod_perl. But if that's the case, I think it's just as well to use Apache::Registry and not worry about it. Unless you're in a Tantalus situation where you can't use a real development environment.

  • Comment on Re: Re: How do you feel about mod_perl?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://123407]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (None)
    As of 2024-04-25 01:03 GMT
    Sections?
    Information?
    Find Nodes?
    Leftovers?
      Voting Booth?

      No recent polls found