Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling
 
PerlMonks  

anonymous monks deserve equal treatment

by particle (Vicar)
on Feb 04, 2002 at 15:11 UTC ( [id://143252]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to anonymous Monks: a double-edged sword in an argument.

I appreciated the jesture and liked that the community supports its members against abuse from others. But I was unsettled that this was done anonymously.

you seem to have a quite cynical view of community. not all members are interested in getting a ++ for their views, positive or negative. some just like using the resource, and don't want to be permanently associated with what they have to say. i admire these few, it makes them immune from 'popularity voting.' not all are like this, but there are some. please accept anonymous monks for what they are, valid, necessary, equal members of this community.

*i get a little upset that people talk of 'wasting votes' on anonymous monks. wasting votes? what is a wasted vote? if you don't vote on something you should, you're wasting a vote. because there's a not a monk who will have a greater possibility of gaining XP is not a good reason not to vote.

i fear even if an anonymous monk posted something brilliant that added greatly to the community, that post would not make it to best nodes. that's a shame.

*Update: this part's a bit off topic...

~Particle

Edit: chipmunk 2002-01-04

  • Comment on anonymous monks deserve equal treatment

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://143252]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others avoiding work at the Monastery: (5)
As of 2024-04-19 12:40 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found