RE: Jaime

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: RE: Jaime by kryten (Scribe) on May 24, 2000 at 15:02 UTC
At least it is not Another of those stupid Haiku Poems Yes I am aware that this is not one either.	[reply]
RE: (3) kryten Jaime by nuance (Hermit) on May 24, 2000 at 18:03 UTC
I couldn't give your post enough positive votes, so I'll give you a resounding "Here, here!" instead. *Nuance* Baldrick, you wouldn't see a subtle plan if it painted itself purple and danced naked on top of a harpsichord, singing "Subtle plans are here again!"	[reply]
RE: RE: Jaime by Q*bert (Sexton) on Jun 17, 2000 at 16:45 UTC
Don't be so critical. Perl deserves to have poems written about it as well as in it. After all, it is traditional to address the muse directly through an ' apostrophe. ;)	[reply]
RE: RE: RE: Jaime by mcwee (Pilgrim) on Jun 18, 2000 at 18:12 UTC
Great point re: apostrophe and the perl-muse. But, let's be real, if I weren't so critical, I'd just be a geek at a terminal with a smelly dog under my chair. At least, as it stands, I'm a geek at a terminal with a stinky beagle and the premier critic of a bold new poetic school. Let a man dream, for heaven's sake. The Autonomic Pilot; it's FunkyTown, babe.	[reply]
RE: RE: Jaime by jjhorner (Hermit) on May 24, 2000 at 01:41 UTC
I was trying to express my wish for Jaime to be as easy to understand as Perl is becoming for me. It was both a compliment to the beauty and wonderfullness of Jaime and to the simplicity and ease of use of Perl. I can only say what my heart feels. JJ	[reply]


No such thing as a small change
	PerlMonks