Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Clear questions and runnable code
get the best and fastest answer

Re: Store results by search term, not session ID

by ask (Pilgrim)
on May 10, 2002 at 03:11 UTC ( #165584=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Store results by search term, not session ID
in thread Database searches with persistent results via CGI

I am amazed that noone else suggested that. Sites using session ids to make searches faster sucks. Blah!

 - ask

ask bjoern hansen,   !try; do();
  • Comment on Re: Store results by search term, not session ID

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Store results by search term, not session ID
by perrin (Chancellor) on May 09, 2002 at 21:47 UTC
    Yeah, when these Java consultants did that in a search they built for the company I work for, I was amazed. I called them on their mistake and they first claimed it wasn't a problem and then claimed that it was our fault for not specifying in the contract that they had to support multiple browser windows! (The old "spec was bad" defense.)

    I think the problem in their case came from how much the Java servlet session interface looks like a cache. It's very tempting to just cache things in it rather than build your own proper cache. This is something to be wary of with Apache::Session too.

    (Incidentally, some of the other posters did mention the idea of using the search terms instead of the session. They just weren't as clear about why.)

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://165584]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (3)
As of 2022-05-26 21:02 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Do you prefer to work remotely?

    Results (94 votes). Check out past polls.