Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling

Re: Re: (jeffa) 3Re: seeking different ways to slice a 2-d array

by Anonymous Monk
on May 14, 2002 at 20:46 UTC ( #166574=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: (jeffa) 3Re: seeking different ways to slice a 2-d array
in thread seeking different ways to slice a 2-d array

I don't like to declare the same variable more than once.
sub read_cache { our %CACHE; ... } sub write_cache { our %CACHF; ... }
Oops. It's so easy to slip... But on the other hand, you have to misspell the variable throughout all of &write_cache, which usually isn't too probable. But for short routines--like get/set routines--it's a not too far-fetched scenario.

For those times I prefer to use
{ our %CACHE; sub read_cache { ... } sub write_cache { ... } }
The only reason I want more education is that I learned about lexical and package variables as totally separate!!! and now they ain't... Which is cool, but also pretty bizarre.

I agree, it does indeed look like globals has become... something else. But you can relax--they haven't. They're still totally separate. What our() does is to declare a lexical alias for the global variable.


Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://166574]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (7)
As of 2023-02-04 22:10 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    I prefer not to run the latest version of Perl because:

    Results (31 votes). Check out past polls.