Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Your skill will accomplish
what the force of many cannot

Re: Node Tension

by mrbbking (Hermit)
on May 24, 2002 at 12:40 UTC ( [id://169037] : note . print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Node Tension

I agree that the 'tension' indicator would be a good idea if it were visible before you cast your vote. And I prefer your simplified method of deriving it. But, for nodes where you can see the reputation (nodes you wrote, or nodes you've voted on) why not just show the total upvotes and total downvotes? What better 'tension' indicator can there be?

As for people getting all worried that the votes on their nodes have not all been positive, wouldn't showing the total votes cast help to minimize the worry?

I would bet that even some of the Best Nodes got some downvotes. Surely, someone clicked off a -- on some of those. If not on the Best Nodes of All Time nodes, certainly on the Best Nodes of This Week nodes...

Seeing that 'it happens to everyone' might make the occasional downvote less painful for those whose self-image is tied too closely to their current Perlmonks XP value.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Node Tension
by mojotoad (Monsignor) on May 24, 2002 at 15:03 UTC
    This occurred to me as well, and as rinceWind pointed out, there already exists an option in Everything to display total number of up and down votes.

    In past discussions around here, there seems to be considerable resistance to this notion, generally expressed along the lines of wishing to avoid "sheep voting" depending on where most votes are falling. I happen to agree that the actual number of votes aren't that important and that "sheep voting" would be a real phenomenon. However, I am still interested in watching a big tug-of-war.