Re: •Re: Obfuscation has no place in production code

I hardly think you are responsible for obfuscated Perl. Purposefully obfuscating code has been around for a lot longer than Perl.

Comment on Re: •Re: Obfuscation has no place in production code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
:>:> •Re: Obfuscation has no place in production code by ignatz (Vicar) on Jun 12, 2002 at 15:36 UTC
Merlyn wasn't taking credit for all code obfuscation. As for the JAPH, his place in history seems to have been well documented. ()-() \"/ `	[reply]
Re: Re: Re: *Re: Obfuscation has no place in production code by Anonymous Monk on Jun 12, 2002 at 15:41 UTC
Yes I know perfectly well about the history of JAPH's. To suggest that "the whole obfu-perl" is a direct descendant of his original JAPH's is just plain silly.	[reply]
:>:>:> *Re: Obfuscation has no place in production code by ignatz (Vicar) on Jun 12, 2002 at 15:55 UTC
God forbid we should ever be silly. Better to be anonymous charmers spreading the love. ()-() \"/ `	[reply]