Come for the quick hacks, stay for the epiphanies. | |
PerlMonks |
Re: Re: Re: Huffman once againby fsn (Friar) |
on Jul 17, 2002 at 20:16 UTC ( [id://182568]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Here is jynx's response back, and I think this will be the final version. It sure looks compact and unreadable to me now. And, yup, it was an enjoyable excersize... update: after reading fsn's scratchpad (which betters my attempts a bit :), there are two last things i can think of that may help: (1) reducing one more variable (2) removing the do{} block... Note how since the variable $: was removed, the $; limit had to be increased to 92 to accomodate and finish printing the string. Also the ==0 check was removed and the ==91 check changed to <92... Don't know if it's more or less obfuscated, and as i've said i'm not very good, but it seems to be more difficult to parse. i had fun with this exercise, and i hope fsn did as well :-) jynx
In Section
Obfuscated Code
|
|