(tye)Re: New code wrap options

Now code is wrapped in <tt class="code"> (for all combinations of wrapping settings). Let me know if that works.

Update: In-line <code> (like that -- stuff in <code> tags that doesn't include a newline) is not designated class="code". If someone wants a class designation for this, then come up with a nice, short, clear name for the class. (:

- tye (but my friends call me "Tye")

Comment on (tye)Re: New code wrap options Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: (tye)Re: New code wrap options by blakem (Monsignor) on Aug 12, 2002 at 22:41 UTC
Thanks tye. Setting CSS styles for `tt.code` instead of `pre tt` works with both user setting options now. -Blake	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re: (tye)Re: New code wrap options by demerphq (Chancellor) on Mar 12, 2004 at 19:01 UTC
If someone wants a class designation for this, then come up with a nice, short, clear name for the class. class="fragment" However getting short and clear at the same times seems to me to be setting the bar too high. Maybe having one without the other is preferable? --- demerphq _{First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Gandhi}	[reply] [d/l]
Re^3: New code wrap options (in-line code CSS class) by tye (Sage) on Mar 12, 2004 at 19:06 UTC
Well, I'd just do "inlinecode". - tye	[reply]
Re: Re^3: New code wrap options (in-line code CSS class) by demerphq (Chancellor) on Mar 12, 2004 at 19:17 UTC
Yep, that was my original though as well, but it seemed too long considering your requirements. I actually thought of suggesting 'icode' but thought that wasnt sufficiently clear. 'inline' or 'inlinecode' seems good to me, as does 'fragment' still. --- demerphq _{First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Gandhi}	[reply] [d/l]


Perl: the Markov chain saw
	PerlMonks