Re: DON'T USE THIS CODE


go ahead... be a heretic
	PerlMonks

Re: DON'T USE THIS CODE

by boo_radley (Parson)

on Sep 16, 2002 at 08:06 UTC ( #198179=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to DON'T USE THIS CODE
in thread File::DumbLock

merlyn sez :

I don't think I should need to add instructions about google-ing to every node I write. {sigh}

Ah, but how would they know they were good examples in your opinion?

Comment on Re: DON'T USE THIS CODE

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: DON'T USE THIS CODE by merlyn (Sage) on Sep 16, 2002 at 08:28 UTC
Ah, but how would they know they were good examples in your opinion? Well, unless I'm schizophrenic, I'd certainly categorize hits to my own columns as "good". -- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker	[reply]
Re: Re: Re: DON'T USE THIS CODE by boo_radley (Parson) on Sep 16, 2002 at 08:50 UTC
So you're saying we need to hear from an objective voice on the subject?	[reply]
Re^4: DON'T USE THIS CODE by particle (Vicar) on Sep 16, 2002 at 15:26 UTC
i don't believe merlyn's objectivity is as important as his expertise on the subject, as evinced by his published work on the subject. ~Particle accelerates	[reply] [d/l]

In Section Code Catacombs

Log In^?

Domain Nodelet^?

www.com | www.net | www.org

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://198179]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others exploiting the Monastery: (1)

Tux

As of 2023-03-21 18:09 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?

Notices^?