Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight
 
PerlMonks  

Re: chatterbox causes heavy load? So why don't switch to IRC?

by BrowserUk (Patriarch)
on Sep 30, 2002 at 10:41 UTC ( [id://201674]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to chatterbox causes heavy load? So why don't switch to IRC?

I made the suggestion before, but I think it worth repeating. As we already have an IFRAME used for the ad at the top of the screen, would it be a hugely provocative move to make the CB a IFRAME as well?.

Done this way, a click on the talk button would only need to refresh the cb, which should a reduced load on the server by not having to re-build the entire page with associated DB hits etc. ?


Cor! Like yer ring! ... HALO dammit! ... 'Ave it yer way! Hal-lo, Mister la-de-da. ... Like yer ring!

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: chatterbox causes heavy load? So why don't switch to IRC?
by shotgunefx (Parson) on Sep 30, 2002 at 11:12 UTC
    I don't know what the support for iframes is like now but you could make it an optional user setting. I bet you would still lighten a lot of load.

    -Lee

    "To be civilized is to deny one's nature."
      IFRAME is part of canonical HTML since 4.0 and supported by MSIE and Mozilla for years. Shouldn't be much of a problem methinks!

      Added bonus: the main page loads independent of the scatterbox stuff, which could improve the overall (subjective) experience. ++BrowserUk.

      --
      Cheers, Joe

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://201674]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others learning in the Monastery: (5)
As of 2024-04-19 07:26 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found