in reply to XP and level balancing

I think I can agree with what you say. Node reps (just lately) seem to be quite high in proportion to "Normal" - maybe I'm getting better at writing stuff (I'd like to think so) or maybe it's simply a case of there being more people with votes.

Having said that, though - while it's nice to log in of a morning and get a whole bunch of XP (not that THAT happens much .. *g*) - it's not the primary reason I come here. I have to write Perl at work, and I'm relatively new to the language (I joined here in August - I'd never touched the language before that), and I find the site invaluable as both a reference source, somewhere to bounce ideas off and just to ask the little niggling (Perl) questions that I can't find the answer to anywhere else.

Whether the XP system existed or not, whether it was more "challenging" to get to higher levels or not, I think it's very important to remember that XP is not the be-all-and-end-all of the PerlMonks site.

On the other hand (perhaps a little OT), node reps are, to me at least, very useful in judging explanations, the usefulness of code examples given and such like. Whether this rep system would work as well without the XP system, or with a modified XP system, would be a small concern to me should any changes be made.

Just my quick thoughts ..
-- Foxcub

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: XP and level balancing
by @rocks (Scribe) on Oct 26, 2002 at 05:57 UTC
    I totally agree. I think that XP is such a minor factor as to why we all are here. We are really one big family together because of Perl not because we crave XP at sites on the web. Not because we want to vote each other and judge each other. Because we all love Perl and we want to help each other.