Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change

Re: NetAddr::IP

by fokat (Deacon)
on Nov 08, 2002 at 04:46 UTC ( #211337=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to NetAddr::IP

Thanks a lot for the positive review. Just to add a few points:

  • Additional formats supported:

    • "Range" notation such as in for 10.10.10/24

    • Cisco's wildcard notation

    • inet_aton and inet_ntoa to feed directly to old-style socket calls

  • The code has been tested in the following platforms by the author: Solaris/Sparc, Linux/Intel, FreeBSD/Intel, Win32/Intel, Digital Unix/Alpha, HP-UX/PA-RISC, Mac OS X/PPC. No reports of endianness-related problems have been received so far.

If you're running a version earlier than 3.00, please do consider upgrading. 3.xx includes vast performance improvements in many operations as well as a simpler internal representation guaranteed to be portable to any machine with 32 bits integers.

Best regards

-lem, but some call me fokat

Update: I mistakenly mentioned 3.20 before it came into existence. Current versions as of this writing are 3.14 (production) and 3.14_1 (development, with fresh patches for IPv6).

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: NetAddr::IP
by Clownburner (Monk) on Dec 04, 2002 at 22:21 UTC
    Thanks. Out of curiosity, where do you get 3.20? The newest version in CPAN seems to be 3.14.
    "Non sequitur. Your facts are un-coordinated." - Nomad
      My mistake. 3.14 and 3.14_1 are the latest versions. The latest version will always be at CPAN.

      Best regards

      -lem, but some call me fokat

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://211337]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (4)
As of 2022-08-16 18:13 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found