laziness, impatience, and hubris | |
PerlMonks |
RE: RE: Father and Sonby raflach (Pilgrim) |
on Jul 12, 2000 at 19:23 UTC ( [id://22209]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Hmmm... Someone obviously thought I was being snitty here, when in fact I didn't intend to be.
While I don't mind perl poetry that doesn't compile, or even perl poetry that looks as if it was code and doesn't compile; perl poetry that pretends to be code but doesn't even look reasonable, but appears instead to be simply stringing a poem together for the most part with a bunch of double colons, needs to be commented on. Nevertheless, I didn't vote it down, as an attempt at perl poetry is better than no perl poetry; but perhaps I should have been more specific in my criticism... ( I also probably would have been less bothered by it had the subject matter had been perl-related.) As it is what we have is bad code, and bad construction, mediocre (at best) poetry, with no reason to perlized, and perlization done poorly... Can anyone explain why someone would waste a vote voting my post down? Too short? They liked the poem? though I was bashing the author? It's incomprhensible to me.
In Section
Perl Poetry
|
|