http://qs1969.pair.com?node_id=248017


in reply to Re: Re: XS ReadOnly HVs
in thread XS ReadOnly HVs

Yes, I think you're right. On the other hand, you haven't explained why you rejected the low-tech alternative of using a tied hash. If it was for speed reasons, and compatibility is important to you, you could fall back to a tied hash implementation on older perls.

Then at least it would work on 5.6.1, albeit slightly more slowly.

 .robin.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re(3): XS ReadOnly HVs
by Anonymous Monk on Apr 04, 2003 at 17:15 UTC
    Good thought... I'll look into that when I get there.

    Thanks,

    Chris