in reply to Re: Re: XS ReadOnly HVs
in thread XS ReadOnly HVs
Yes, I think you're right. On the other hand, you haven't explained
why you rejected the low-tech alternative of using a tied
hash. If it was for speed reasons, and compatibility is important to you, you could fall back to a tied hash implementation on older perls.
Then at least it would work on 5.6.1, albeit slightly more slowly.
.robin.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re: Re(3): XS ReadOnly HVs
by Anonymous Monk on Apr 04, 2003 at 17:15 UTC |
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom