Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change
 
PerlMonks  

RE: Perl Monks Cookbook?

by KM (Priest)
on Jul 28, 2000 at 22:05 UTC ( [id://24942]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Perl Monks Cookbook?

I think you are getting into dangerous territory here. First, you need to find out legal issues with who owns the answers posted. Do I own my answer, or does Everything Inc. own it (I have seen nothing here stating that I give up any copyright for my text)? Assuming that our answers are public domain, no royalties would need to be paid. Personally, I certainly wouldn't post any more answers here knowing you can take them and make money from them. And, I would erase all my previous answers to ensure you don't make money by simply printing my words. People would have to clearly know up front that anything posted to this site may be used in full for print reproduction without concent. Anyways, I have had this same sort of discussion with perlfaq.com, and it is somewhat of a dangerous territory (at least of perlfaq.com authors are limited, here they are not). Also, most answers found here are available in books, FAQs and documentation freely available. They are also freely available here. You would essentially be trying to duplicate the Perl Cookbook, which is Wrong IMO. Other issues are that I don't know who would buy a book with answers from dozens of people, many unknowns. Many answers posted on this site are simply wrong, which would be hard on the books credibility.. blah blah.. anyways.. my $.03 :)

Cheers,
KM

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: RE: Perl Monks Cookbook?
by princepawn (Parson) on Jul 28, 2000 at 22:34 UTC
    The first thing you need to understand and observe is that my post did not say: "I want to gobble up all the info here and act as if I knew it all and write a book." It was patently clear in my initial post that I was going to allocate royalties as a function of contribution to content.

    And that means I would do so regardless of whether I was legally bound to or not, because I am ethically bound to do it regardless of what I might be able to abscond away with legally... I have been benefitting from free software since 1987 and have yet to help out as much as I have been helped and now I think I finally can do something.

    And responding to another post as well as a sentiment expressed by KM, Just because there is one Perl Cookbook does not mean there cannot be another one with just as much content on topics completely uncovered by the first one. I mean, no-one complains when the 900th beginner perl book teaching the same things comes out, but the second I want to create a book with the same focus as the Cookbook, but new and fresh and highly useful content, people are up in arms.

    And besides, the Cookbook and Programming Perl are largely similar even exact verbatim wordings of online docs widely available. They did the same thing why shouldn't we? Just think of how many more people will come to PerlMonks.ORG if we put out a book.

    And finally, I have just had a mindspring. For a long time, I have wanted to cut out what I see as WASTE in the Perl Community. We have 25 modules that do text templating with little uniqueness among them. 5 or so that allow for easy navigation of complex nests of array and hashrefs. We have PerlMonks, PerlArchive, CPAN, Use.perl.org, effectiveperl.org, and news.perl.org and should I mention Matts SCript ARchive? ... in short what we have is a flagrant violation of the first rule of software engineering: never re-invent the wheel.

    So gentlemen and women (or is that gentlemonks as suggested by my office-mate), let us decide on how best to navigate the current state of affairs in the Perl Community in keeping with the spirit of free software as espoused by the likes of Richard Stallman, Linus Torvalds, and Larry Wall. And we could consider vroom a pioneer in the field of free information sharing.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://24942]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (7)
As of 2024-04-19 08:07 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found