Re: Common RegExps

Is there a regex that recognises RFC822 email addresses? I'm not asking to see one, I'm asking if it is even possible! RFC822 is notoriously difficult. It wouldn't surprise me if it couldn't be done.

(For instance, doesn't RFC822 allow nested comments? If so, that would ruin it right there...)

Comment on Re: Common RegExps

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: Re: Common RegExps by young perlhopper (Scribe) on Jul 31, 2000 at 22:53 UTC
The 'owl' book (mastering regular expressions) is a great text for questions like this, and my answer comes from it (paraphrased): No, you can't really recognize a valid email address with a regex, because technically an email address can have arbitrarily nested comments in parentheses, and a regular expression can never recognize arbitrarily deep nested structures. When you start talking about balanced constructs, you are out of the land of regular languages and into the land of context free languages. I wonder if it would be useful or just unnecessary to have native support for context free grammars in perl... To recognize all valid email address that have less than or equal to 1 level of comments requires something like a 5000 byte regular expression. The moral of this story is that regex's can't do everything. -Mark	[reply]
RE: Re: Common RegExps by Ted Nitz (Chaplain) on Jul 31, 2000 at 22:48 UTC
There's an index in Mastering Regular Expressions which is a regex for RFC822 addresses, well except for arbitrarailly nested comments... I think it uses a max of 5 levels or something along those lines. It takes somewhere around 5 pages, and is commented quite well, but it's still not something I'd ever want to have to build. -Ted	[reply]


Syntactic Confectionery Delight
	PerlMonks