Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: (2) Proportional Reputation (avoid encouraging controversy for it's own sake)

by agentv (Friar)
on May 02, 2003 at 21:10 UTC ( [id://255165]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: (2) Proportional Reputation (avoid encouraging controversy for it's own sake)
in thread Proportional Reputation

> encouraging controversy for controversy's sake.

...and yet, I have to say that there is a valid distinction between a reputation 12 node that has been voted on a mere 12 times, and one that has garnered 100 votes, with a mild bias in favor of the good.

This distinction may be illuminating, but of course we must also keep in mind that we don't see a node's reputation until after we've made a decision about it ourselves.

...All the world looks like -well- all the world, when your hammer is Perl.
---v

  • Comment on Re: Re: (2) Proportional Reputation (avoid encouraging controversy for it's own sake)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://255165]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others admiring the Monastery: (9)
As of 2024-04-18 11:05 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found