Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: combining html and on-the-fly images using Image::Magick

by jepri (Parson)
on May 25, 2003 at 05:20 UTC ( [id://260665]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: combining html and on-the-fly images using Image::Magick
in thread combining html and on-the-fly images using Image::Magick

That is indeed a cool trick, and is much needed, but I can't see any specs for it at w3c.org, which makes me think it is browser specific and therefore A Bad Thing, regardless of how cool it is.

(Standards are everything. Obey the w3c. The w3c is your friend.)

Update: the w3c has nothing to say on the matter, but the IETF does (as mentioned below in this thread). So yay to that. ____________________
Jeremy
I didn't believe in evil until I dated it.

  • Comment on Re: Re: Re: combining html and on-the-fly images using Image::Magick

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Re: combining html and on-the-fly images using Image::Magick
by revdiablo (Prior) on May 25, 2003 at 05:43 UTC
      OK, you win and I am an enthusiastic supporter.

      Although that tag length limit is a bummer.

      ____________________
      Jeremy
      I didn't believe in evil until I dated it.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://260665]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (2)
As of 2024-04-25 06:26 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found