Appending strings from one array onto strings of another

eyepopslikeamosquito has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Appending one array onto another by sauoq (Abbot) on Jun 10, 2003 at 09:00 UTC
`$_ .= shift @d for @z; # Elegant, but destroys @d. my $i; $_ .= $d[$i++] for @z; # Less elegant, no destruction.` [download] I really don't care for that second one. I'd probably prefer the first one you gave over it. But, I offer it in the name of TIMTOWTDI anyway. -sauoq "My two cents aren't worth a dime.";	[reply] [d/l]
Re^2: Appending one array onto another by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Jun 10, 2003 at 22:00 UTC
`sub { $_ .= shift for @z }->(@d);` [download] grin Makeshifts last the longest.	[reply] [d/l]
Re: Appending one array onto another by Anonymous Monk on Jun 10, 2003 at 10:50 UTC
perl6 (hyper ops) (synatx may not be exactly this, but you get the idea): `@z ^_= @d;` [download] or `@appended = @z ^_ @d;` [download]	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re: Appending one array onto another by Skeeve (Parson) on Jun 10, 2003 at 09:18 UTC
And here are my 2 Euro-Cent `@z=map{$_.$d[-1+push@d,shift@d]}@z;` [download] Update: One can use a side-effect and avoid the assignment of an array: `map{$_.=$d[-1+push@d,shift@d]}@z;` [download]	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re: Re: Appending one array onto another by sauoq (Abbot) on Jun 10, 2003 at 09:33 UTC
And using aliasing to our advantage but avoiding map in void context yields `$_ .= $d[-1 + push @d, shift @d] for @z;` [download] I'm not convinced that it's at all better than the first one in the OP though. This is a bit obscure for no really good reason. -sauoq "My two cents aren't worth a dime.";	[reply] [d/l]
Re: Re: Re: Appending one array onto another by Skeeve (Parson) on Jun 10, 2003 at 09:38 UTC
I like that one! It's obscure, yes. But not for "no really good reason" but for avoiding an aditional variable. But now as I think of it ;-) Okay: It's no really good reasone. Maybe I should think about my taking part in perl-minigolf and obfuscation.	[reply]
Re: Appending one array onto another by TomDLux (Vicar) on Jun 10, 2003 at 14:35 UTC
The hyper operator is more appropriate `@z .^~ @a; # I believe _ has been replaced by ~ # as the new replacement for '.'` [download] but multi-variable loops work, too, though not as fast. `my @new; for @z;@d -> $z;$d { push @new, $z ~ $d; }` [download] -- `TTTATCGGTCGTTATATAGATGTTTGCA`	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re: Appending one array onto another by novitiate (Scribe) on Jun 10, 2003 at 14:52 UTC
honestly, maybe i'm too in love with perl5, but i don't see what could be more elegant than your first example. it's a nice one liner that is not very obscure - maybe not the most optimized - but appropriate here. humbly, novitiate "...goodnight you princes of main(e)" --The Cider House Rules	[reply]
Re: Appending one array onto another by denthijs (Acolyte) on Jun 10, 2003 at 09:27 UTC
i'm prolly reading the question wrong (just woke up). but to append two arrays i usually just `@new = (@one,@two)` but im too vague to understand the example code atm. cheers	[reply] [d/l]


Think about Loose Coupling
	PerlMonks