http://qs1969.pair.com?node_id=286212


in reply to On deleting node contents

I also laughed quite a bit about the huge list of responses to appearently empty nodes. But as 285414 for instance is a root node, the author wouldn't even have the possibility to withdraw its content, unless I am somehow mistaken. Wonder what happened to it then.
Additional / alternative suggestion: Just make this a consideration issue - just make it possible to consider adding the original contents of a node to it - this would still preserve its new content.
Just a thought from a little monk, though.
CombatSquirrel.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: On deleting node contents
by Anonymous Monk on Aug 24, 2003 at 21:59 UTC
    But as 285414 for instance is a root node, the author wouldn't even have the possibility to withdraw its content, unless I am somehow mistaken.

    You're mistaken. :)

    Root nodes in Obfuscation can be changed, except by me, of course!.

    Check turnstep's home node for the complete list. Search for Which top-level nodes *are* editable?

[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion