If it ain't broke, there's no need to fix it. Right. Nevertheless, these lines jumped out at me:

my $aux=0;
foreach my $pos (@files){
  $files[$aux]="\t\"".$path."\\".$files[$aux]."\""."   $esquema\n";
  $aux++;
}
[download]

1. Variable interpolation

First, take the line:

This reminds me of something else I saw recently, which (simplified) read something like this:

As if Perl didn't allow variable interpolation! Your line can be simplified to:

Further, by using qq(), you would no longer have to escape the double quotes:

which I for one find a bit easier on the eye.

2. for/foreach loops

But now to come to your foreach loop (inner bit modified as above):

my $aux=0;
foreach my $pos (@files){
  $files[$aux] = qq '\t"$path\\$files[$aux]"   $esquema\n';
  $aux++;
}
[download]

I'm far from being a Perl guru, but I think I may safely say that this is ugly :) You can do this far more efficiently in Perl:

foreach my $pos ( 0 .. $#files ) {
  $files[$pos] = qq '\t"$path\\$files[$pos]"   $esquema\n';
}
[download]

<parenthesis>Occasionally, you might also come across some rather quaint variations of the above, along the lines of:

but it's best to forget these unless you want to increment your counter ($pos) by anything other than 1.</parenthesis>

However, you would still not be using the full power of Perl. To quote Marc Jason Dominus: "Any time you have a C-like for loop that loops over the indices of an array, you're probably making a mistake." A more perlish way to do what you want would be:

foreach my $file ( @files ) {
   $file = qq '\t"$path\\$file"   $esquema\n';
}
[download]

In fact, you can use Perl's built-in $_ variable to shorten that even further:

for ( @files ) {    # 'for' and 'foreach' are equivalent
   $_ = qq '\t"$path\\$_"   $esquema\n';
}
[download]

From which, to end this far longer than intially intended post, it is only a short step to using map:

@files = map { qq '\t"$path\\$_"   $esquema\n' } @files;

HTH

dave