Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Open Source Needs Open Discussion

by adrianh (Chancellor)
on Sep 11, 2003 at 21:25 UTC ( #290829=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to (OT) Open Source Needs Open Discussion

In short, open source is of limited value unless you have an open type of development coupled with some structured manner of review.

What - like CPAN you mean :-)

Yes a lot of open source projects fail for various reasons. So do a lot of non-open projects (often in a less public manner). As chromatic says, being open-source doesn't free you from having a sensible development process.

I really don't think most open source projects fail because of a lack of an open development process. They fail because of lack of time and will, rather than due to any lack of input from the world in general.

People can suggest options and ideas all they like. In the end somebody has to do the work and implement the feature. If they don't want to do it - if it does supply that vital itch that they need to scratch - then it won't get done. No matter what the theoretical technical merit may be.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://290829]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (4)
As of 2022-06-27 11:19 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    My most frequent journeys are powered by:









    Results (88 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?