Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: Re: Class automators should be standard

by danb (Friar)
on Jan 15, 2004 at 03:16 UTC ( [id://321454]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: Re: Class automators should be standard
in thread Class automators should be standard

Your point is a good one. It is necessary to hand-roll methods that do anything non-simple, like keeping is_from_west_coast() in the correct state.

Because of that, C:MM can only be used for simple methods. In my case, that means C:MM methods are usually private methods, and public methods are hand-rolled.

I am looking forward to automatic method constructors getting smarter in the future. I could imagine a module that combines something like Params::Validate with C:MM, like so:

use Class::MethodMaker optional => [ 'zone_file' => [ 'no spaces', 'alpha only', 'uppercase', 'error on parameter failure' ] ];

-Dan

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://321454]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others avoiding work at the Monastery: (3)
As of 2024-04-20 10:42 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found