Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Clear questions and runnable code
get the best and fastest answer
 
PerlMonks  

Re: All in one

by rkg (Hermit)
on Jan 15, 2004 at 03:25 UTC ( [id://321455]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to All in one

I think some of the reason coders sometimes seek get things done in a single line is the resemblance of perl to natural language. Larry's roots as a linguist are reflected in the language he built.

Constructs like

open(F, ">foo.txt") or die "hey, couldn't open foo.txt";
resemble how we talk, rather than the more formal
if (!open(F, ">foo.txt")) { die "hey, couldn't open foo.txt"; }
Somehow, opening and closing a block seems... burdensome.

Burdensome not due to typing an extra character or two, but burdensome because the block and whitespace seem to make too big of a deal about something small, which at a subconscious level causes mild dissonance and slows down the brain.

My two cents.

LATER UPDATE

I find myself trying to write code like this

# does not work die "missing arg $_" unless $args{$_} for (qw(foo bar baz boop));
which feels more natural than opening a block (my dissonance theory)
# untested for (qw(foo bar baz boop)) { die "missing arg $_" unless $args{$_}; }
Similar is the use of $_ to mean "this" or "that" in natural language.

All of these shortcut constructs are quicker and more like natural language -- and more difficult for someone entering the conversation late.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://321455]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others having a coffee break in the Monastery: (9)
As of 2024-03-28 18:48 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found