Re: regex logical equivalence?

I think you might find it worthwhile to learn about /x at this point as these regular expressions could certainly do with some commenting. /x isn't hard or scary at all. All you have to do is rememeber to escape the whitespace you want and the #s. It makes regular expressions much easier to explain.

Just to make things more confusing ;) I'm going to swap the order of these two expressions, so my first one will be the longer of the two and I'll work on the the shorter (my second - your first) as I think that's the one you wanted to focus on.

To determine if your two regular expressions are suffiently equivalent we need to compare them.

This is the longer one:

/.*                      # Stuff
 (                        # START capturing to $1 
    [$\ \#\%>~]           # Any single space, $, #, %, > or ~
   |                      # OR
    \[*                   # 0 or more [s
    \w*                   # 0 or more word characters (a-zA-Z0-9_) 
    \@*                   # 0 or more @s
    \-*                   # 0 or more -s
    \w*                   # more word characters
    \%                    # Exactly 1 %
    \]*                   # 0 or more ]s
   |                      # OR
    \[*\w*\@*\-*\w*\#\]*  # As above, but with a # instead of %
   |                      # OR
    \[*\w*\@*\-*\w*\$\]*  # As above, but with a $
   |                      # OR
    \[*\w*\@*\-*\w*>\]*   # As above, but with no terminator 
                          # (will therefore match any terminator)
   |                      # OR
    \\\[\\e\[0m\\\]\ \[0m # the sequence: \[\e[0m\\] [0m
 )                        # END of $1
 \s?                      # 0 or 1 spaces
/x
[download]

and this the shorter:

/.*                      # Stuff
 (                        # START capturing to $1 
    \[*                   # 0 or more [s
    \w*                   # 0 or more word characters
    \@*                   # 0 or more @s
    \-*                   # 0 or more -s
    \w*                   # more word characters
    [$\ \#\%>~]           # exactly 1 space, $, #, %, > or ~
    \]                    # exactly 1 ] (are you missing a * ?)
  |                       # OR 
    \\\[\\e\[0m\\\]\ \[0m # the sequence: \[\e[0m\\] [0m
 )                        # END of $1
\s?                      # 0 or 1 spaces
/x
[download]

Now we need to consider what patterns will match one, but not the other... (I'm going to assume you are missing a * up there next to your ], if not, then these aren't very equivalent at all).

Any 1 space, $, #, %, > or ~ will be matched by both.
The escape sequence: \[\e[0m\\] [0m is allowed by both.
Each pattern: [w@-w$], [w@-w#], [w@-w%], [w@-w~] is allowed by both.
[w@-w ] is (as you shown) is allowed by the second but not the first (this is easy to fix)

Like you, I can only spot this one significant difference between the two regular expressions (once you fix your typo).

This is easily fixed:

/.*                      # Stuff
 (                        # START capturing to $1 
    \                     # exactly 1 space
  |                       # OR
    \[*                   # 0 or more [s
    \w*                   # 0 or more word characters
    \@*                   # 0 or more @s
    \-*                   # 0 or more -s
    \w*                   # more word characters
    [$\#\%>~]              # exactly 1 of $, #, %, > or ~
    \]*                   # 0 or more ]s
  |                       # OR 
    \\\[\\e\[0m\\\]\ \[0m # the sequence: \[\e[0m\\] [0m
 )                        # END of $1
\s?                      # 0 or 1 spaces
/x
[download]

Note that this equivalence won't necessarily remain true if you change your quantifiers. In particular if you change all of your *s to ?s. If you want my opinion I suspect you're actually looking more for a regular expression like this:

/.*                      # Stuff
 (                        # START capturing to $1 
    \                     # exactly 1 space
  |                       # OR
    \[?                   # 0 or 1 [
    \w*                   # 0 or more word characters
    \@?                   # 0 or 1 @
    [-\w.]*               # 0 or more word chars, dots and hyphens eg 
+w-w.w-.w
    [$\#\%>~]             # exactly 1 of $, #, %, > or ~
    \]?                   # 0 or 1 ]
  |                       # OR 
    \\\[\\e\[0m\\\]\ \[0m # the sequence: \[\e[0m\\] [0m
 )                        # END of $1
\s?                      # 0 or 1 spaces
/x
[download]

But I may be wrong - you may not be interested in the dot at all. ;) I'm not 100% certain that you want the .* at the front though. Do you have some sample data for us?

I hope you recognise that both expressions will match any string with a single space in it... which will be most strings....

I hope this helps.

jarich

Comment on Re: regex logical equivalence? Select or Download Code


Just another Perl shrine
	PerlMonks