Re: Re: Re: Re: Perl6 Timeline By Apocalypse


good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW
	PerlMonks

Re: Re: Re: Re: Perl6 Timeline By Apocalypse

by chromatic (Archbishop)

on Feb 29, 2004 at 00:02 UTC ( [id://332569]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Re: Re: Re: Perl6 Timeline By Apocalypse
in thread Perl6 Timeline By Apocalypse

On the Parrot side, the shy lurkers thread produced several good ideas to get involved, from working with the docs to updating the web site and even working on the small TODO list.

On the Perl 6 side, the Perl 6 Stories wiki might be of some use, especially with a new Exegesis out now and Apocalypse 12 coming soon.

Comment on Re: Re: Re: Re: Perl6 Timeline By Apocalypse

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Perl6 Timeline By Apocalypse
by flyingmoose (Priest) on Feb 29, 2004 at 02:36 UTC

How does the development process work? How does one sign-up for work items? Or is it a "look I implemented this first" kind of thing? I understand the patch system, all that seems to make sense...the question is, who determines who does what, or what is a good idea or what should actually be included?

Definitely I need to lurk a while and understand what is going on -- I just don't want to lurk forever and never figure the process out though, as it appears this may be the case.

Thanks -- 'moose

[reply]

In Section Perl News