![]() |
|
Just another Perl shrine | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Normally a type has a fixed size that is known at compile time and sizeof() works just fine. That is not true in this case.
Well, I think that the struct, as presented in the original post, does have a definite size (of 16 bytes). AFAIK specifying char *str[1] is equivalent to char * str. I just went with the spec provided, even though it looked rather odd. It did occur to me that the OP might have intended char ** string_array (as you've suggested), and I probably should have pressed MaxPerl about that. But, either way, the struct has a definite size - and we can assign memory to it based on that size (which is 16 bytes, on my Windows 11 64-bit system). I've no experience with structs that might require varying amounts of memory that can't be known until runtime. (I don't assume that such cases never arise.) I expect that the OP's strings have been created separately. Therefore, the number and size of them has no impact on the struct's memory allocation - because the struct just takes a pointer to the array of strings, no matter how large that array is. Cheers, Rob In reply to Re^3: Perl XS binding to a struct with an array of chars*
by syphilis
|
|