![]() |
|
No such thing as a small change | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Hi Ken
I can't comment on the rational behind this limit, but > Scrolling through (the very long) As a tip: you don't need that, those nodes are still in RAT - well depending on the ancestor settings° - you just have to expand the folded parents. I can only see one˛ Re^9 with an +/- to the right, after 3 unfold-clicks I saw the Re^12 in question.
Cheers Rolf °) my view settings show: Current View Mode is Node Ancestors, switch to Root and Node , Minimal Nodes or Full Thread . ˛) OK after switching to Full Thread I saw 2 folded Re^9 but still... In reply to Re: Recently Active Threads: limited maximum node depth
by LanX
|
|