Dear all,
while meditation over the vast amounts of time needed by Text::Overlaps to calculate some sort of longest common prefixes, I encountered a strange pattern.
A variable is instantiated using the string concatenation operator: my $str1 .= $self->sanitizeString ($input1);
Is it some sort of typo, that simply works because Perl can handle it?
Or is there some hidden speedup magic behind this kind of variable instantiation?
Speed differences seem to be in scope of measurement inaccuracies / noise:
#!perl
use strict;
use warnings;
use 5.020;
use Benchmark;
my $s1 .= 'Peter geht nach Hause geht';
my $s2 = 'Peter nach Hause geht';
## Method number one - a numeric sort
sub test_concat {
my $string = shift;
my $s1x .= $string;
return $s1x;
}
## Method number two - an alphabetic sort
sub test_normal {
my $string = shift;
my $s1x = $string;
return $s1x;
}
## We'll test each one, with simple labels
my $count = 1000000;
timethese (
$count,
{
'Method One' => sub{ test_concat($s1); },
'Method Two' => sub{ test_normal($s1); },
}
);
exit(0);
Result:
Benchmark: timing 1000000 iterations of Method One, Method Two...
Method One: 4 wallclock secs ( 4.13 usr + 0.00 sys = 4.13 CPU) @ 24
+2424.24/s (n=1000000)
Method Two: 5 wallclock secs ( 4.39 usr + 0.00 sys = 4.39 CPU) @ 22
+7738.56/s (n=1000000)
Peeking at what Perl does when instantiating a variable one way or another:
>perl -MO=Concise script-concat.pl
6 <@> leave[1 ref] vKP/REFC ->(end)
1 <0> enter ->2
2 <;> nextstate(main 4 script-concat.pl:7) v:*,&,{,x*,x&,x$
,$,201328640 ->3
5 <2> concat[t2] vKS/2 ->6
3 <0> padsv[$s1:4,5] sRM/LVINTRO ->4
4 <$> const[PV "Peter geht nach Hause geht"] s ->5
script-concat.pl syntax OK
>perl -MO=Concise script-assign.pl
e-variable-instantiation.pl
6 <@> leave[1 ref] vKP/REFC ->(end)
1 <0> enter ->2
2 <;> nextstate(main 4 script-assign.pl:7) v:*,&,{,x*,x&,x$
,$,201328640 ->3
5 <2> sassign vKS/2 ->6
3 <$> const[PV "Peter geht nach Hause geht"] s ->4
4 <0> padsv[$s1:4,5] sRM*/LVINTRO ->5
script-assign.pl syntax OK
there is a tiny difference (concat vs. sassign).
Is it worth to put up a patch to change the operator? Or can it be neglected?
-
Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
-
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big>
<blockquote> <br /> <dd>
<dl> <dt> <em> <font>
<h1> <h2> <h3> <h4>
<h5> <h6> <hr /> <i>
<li> <nbsp> <ol> <p>
<small> <strike> <strong>
<sub> <sup> <table>
<td> <th> <tr> <tt>
<u> <ul>
-
Snippets of code should be wrapped in
<code> tags not
<pre> tags. In fact, <pre>
tags should generally be avoided. If they must
be used, extreme care should be
taken to ensure that their contents do not
have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent
horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor
intervention).
-
Want more info? How to link
or How to display code and escape characters
are good places to start.