comment on

I had a mojolicious website that was built 2 years ago and was running...and then it no longer ran. I needed to hire an expert to figure out what was wrong. wasn't a big deal for the expert, but not possible to find out for a non-expert. (CGI.pm never broke. I presume plack/psgi don't either. All low-level enough. I presume Dancer, Mojo, and Catalyst need some tending...)

Can I renew my call for a basic question: why Dancer2 over Mojo? why Mojo over Dancer2?

(Incidentally, are any web frameworks planned to work with perl6?)

/iaw

In reply to Re^2: UP-TO-DATE Comparison of CGI Alternatives by iaw4
in thread UP-TO-DATE Comparison of CGI Alternatives by iaw4

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW
	PerlMonks