In particular, the Methodology section makes it clear that some tests are deliberately written non-idiomatically so that they can test common features of all the languages.

This notion of non-idiomatic should be clearly defined, to my mind,
it's (at best) unfair, beccause it gives a serious advantage to the ones considered as 'idiomatic' (C?).
Moreover why compare languages if you can't use their own strengths ?

Anyway I don't think that adding useless instruction in Perl make it 'non-idiomatic Perl'.

Furthermore look at other language examples I DO find that some of them use language specific idioms.
(some haskell and ruby code for example)

UPDATE :

From the methodology text :

Since functional languages have such a different mode of expression, I allow them more leeway

In some cases I'm not really measuring the speed of a language, but how good of a programmer I am in that given language.

"Only Bad Coders Code Badly In Perl" (OBC2BIP)

---

---

• Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
• Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:

  <code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>

• Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
• Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.