Reaped nodes are still accessible, that was my point that
I dropped when it was said in effect: "it is better to edit the
node to comment about the error than asking for shoving
it under the carpet".
You are probably right about the unethicality of altering
the past on perlmonks. But even without manipulation,
media are always rehashing the past in new ways.
Before modern media analysis a la Mc Luhan, the greek philosophers were already poundering of the complex relations between the past and the present.
Anyway, with wayback, it becomes dangerous to erase the past
because it is so easy to unearth it.
Example: the MS diatribe against Linux. The original Microsoft URL gives a 404, but you can find
here for a good laugh.
Hum, perlmonks seems to cook the URL in weird way. So I spell out the URL.
stefp -- check out TeXmacs
Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big>
<blockquote> <br /> <dd>
<dl> <dt> <em> <font>
<h1> <h2> <h3> <h4>
<h5> <h6> <hr /> <i>
<li> <nbsp> <ol> <p>
<small> <strike> <strong>
<sub> <sup> <table>
<td> <th> <tr> <tt>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in
<code> tags not
<pre> tags. In fact, <pre>
tags should generally be avoided. If they must
be used, extreme care should be
taken to ensure that their contents do not
have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent
horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor
Want more info? How to link or
or How to display code and escape characters
are good places to start.