Earlier I mused that with Perl 6 "patterns", the uniformity between grammar rules and package subs could be even more unified, by allowing any subs to "fail" and "backtrack". Then you have a forward-chaining logic language like Prolog.
You could, I beleive, code functions for your primitives that indeed access data in different parts of a data structure and return pass/fail, but then string them together in a Rule to provide for the backtracking.
Second, consider expanding out any non-cyclic data structure into a long string, like what Dumper does. Armed with regex tools that include Ballanced Parens etc., this can be parsed with grammer rules, right? So where's the other dimentions, exactly?
-
Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
-
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big>
<blockquote> <br /> <dd>
<dl> <dt> <em> <font>
<h1> <h2> <h3> <h4>
<h5> <h6> <hr /> <i>
<li> <nbsp> <ol> <p>
<small> <strike> <strong>
<sub> <sup> <table>
<td> <th> <tr> <tt>
<u> <ul>
-
Snippets of code should be wrapped in
<code> tags not
<pre> tags. In fact, <pre>
tags should generally be avoided. If they must
be used, extreme care should be
taken to ensure that their contents do not
have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent
horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor
intervention).
-
Want more info? How to link
or How to display code and escape characters
are good places to start.
|
