![]() |
|
laziness, impatience, and hubris | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Stats ain't my forte, but wouldn't this only be true if tests A & B were both capable of detecting all the possible unknown bugs? If this the case, then all you need to make this work is a sure fire way of designing tests that are guarenteed to be capable of detecting all possible bugs. Actually, you would probably need a way of designing two independant tests capable of detecting all possible bugs, as I doubt it would work if the two tests were the same:) Examine what is said, not who speaks.
"Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham"When I'm working on a problem, I never think about beauty. I think only how to solve the problem. But when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong." -Richard Buckminster Fuller In reply to Re: Re: Testing by Contract
by BrowserUk
|
|