Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl: the Markov chain saw
 
PerlMonks  

comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??
Oddly enough, you seem to be correct. Passing a 100 kb string and then assigning its first 5 characters to a another string 10,000,000 times took 17 seconds via a regular pass and 22 seconds when passing by reference. However, updating the first 5 characters of the string via reference only took 26 seconds for the same 10,000,000 iterations, while updating and passing back without references took 28 seconds for only 300,000 iterations. Of course, it took 20 seconds for 10,000,000 iterations when updated and not passed back, so the bottom line is:

If you want to use a string but not change it OUTSIDE OF THE SUB's SCOPE, pass without references:
(EDIT: See below - you can even change the item without references)

mysub($str);

If you want to update a string during its pass to a sub, pass as reference:

mysub(\$str);

EDIT: From the CB:

<tilly> Here is a function that swaps the first two variables passed in: sub swap {@_[0,1] = @_[1,0];}
<tilly> Perl is pass by reference, return by value, copy by value.
<TedPride> Odd. So as long as you reference via the default input/output array, you can update even if something isn't passed via reference.
<tilly> @_ contains aliases to the passed in values. As soon as you copy it out into local variables you've copied by value. If you call substr directly on the contents of @_ it is faster than having to create and undo references.

So you can even update items that haven't been passed via reference, as long as they stay inside @_. One wonders now why anyone uses references...

EDIT: That should read, "One wonders why anyone uses references when passing data to subs." References are useful for keeping track of anonymous subs, for pointing to sections of nested structures, and so on.


In reply to Re: Answer: Is is computationally expensive to return a large string (50-100 kB) from a sub? by TedPride
in thread Is it computationally expensive to return a large string (50-100 kB) from a sub? by cbraga

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
    <code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
  • Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
  • Want more info? How to link or or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.
Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (1)
As of 2022-07-03 00:16 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    My most frequent journeys are powered by:









    Results (103 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?