comment on

This is a review? This gives me virtually no useful information -- it's the opinion of an anonymous monk, without any backup in hard facts. Nothing about what's found lacking, why it's good for quick testing of web services, or why other languages might be better (not to mention that I don't really think of "module review" as the right place to do language considerations -- a particular module probably shouldn't be used to compare whole languages).

"the restriction posed by the Perl language": what restriction would this be?

-----------------
_{s''limp';@p=split '!','n!h!p!';s,m,s,;$s=y;$c=slice @p1;so brutally;d;$n=reverse;$c=$s**$#p;print(''.$c^chop($n))while($c/=$#p)>=1;}

In reply to Re: SOAP::Lite by SamCG
in thread Reaped: SOAP::Lite by NodeReaper

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


Problems? Is your data what you think it is?
	PerlMonks