go ahead... be a heretic | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Maybe it's just me; I feel like it's more explicit when I see it together with strict, spelled out:
But I confess that I still don't trust -w on Windows (even though I now know it works perfectly well), because Windows ignores the first part of the shebang line. To test this, you can do:
and it'll still run Perl correctly. Granted this isn't a reason to stop using -w, which still does work as I mentioned, but it did make me suspicious of the whole top line for quite a while. s''(q.S:$/9=(T1';s;(..)(..);$..=substr+crypt($1,$2),2,3;eg;print$..$/ In reply to Re^3: Data type validation using regular expressions
by liverpole
|
|