Clear questions and runnable code get the best and fastest answer |
|
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
You are correct, within the context of the conditions in your initial clause; in fact, one of my (test) browsers renders <i>...</i> text in boldface, pointing up the fact that Gavin's reply below is a more precise characterization. For reference, however, this, from w3c (at http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/present/graphics.html#h-15.2.1): (Emphasis in original; the draft .html 5 language is different.) You will notice that w3c deprecates the last two, whereas PM does NOT (though I suspect you will find a consensus here against the use of U). Further, since you mention CSS, the word "style" in the w3c statement is NOT a reference to CSS. And -- at this time -- the specialized sub- and super-set of .html 4.01 used in the Monastery does NOT accept .css entered in an input box. To demonstrate: <p style="font-style: italic;">This will NOT render as italic.</p>This will NOT render as italic. In fact, if you have "enforce" turned on and "reporting" set high in Display Settings (see above), you will see the second <p style="font-style: italic;"> highlighted (in my case, in a light grey) as non-conformant. Of course, you can impose your own preferences on rendering by supplying .css in your personal style-sheet, but there's no assurance that other readers will have it rendered as you do. In reply to Re^2: RFC: Monastery Markup Introduction
by ww
|
|