Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
With regard to single/multiple authors, I have chosen to be neutral in the comparison. This way, the reader can decide on it himself/herself. I have taken out the second best/worst performance bit. You have a point there. Static class metadata generation is a feauture of Rose::DB::Object only. This is distinct from dynamic run-time generation, which is present in DBIx::Class too. Rose::DB::Object lets you generate the code from the database and then save it in a static manner. It's a semi-manual process. On the other hand, the fully dynamic style (like that of DBIx::Class) is also available. For the other points, I have updated the comparison. In reply to Re^2: Perl ORM comparison (Class::DBI vs. DBIx::Class vs. Rose::DB::Object)
by aulusoy
|
|